[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Little help with blk ring
> > > > >>> On 07.05.12 at 08:23, Daniel Castro <evil.dani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello List, > > > > > > I have a small problem with the ring when transferring blocks the id > > > on the response is different from the request. > > > This is the boot up read, count 0. > > > The guest requests block 0, it has to be located at 7c00. > > > > > > I go ahead and create a REQUEST with this data: > > > ring_req = RING_GET_REQUEST(priv,priv->req_prod_pvt); > > > ring_req->id = 9; > > > ring_req->nr_segments=1; > > > ring_req->operation = BLKIF_OP_READ; ring_req->sector_number = > > > (int)op->lba; //sector to be read ring_req->seg[0].gref = > > > (bi->buffer_gref); //this should be get_free_gref(); > > > ring_req->seg[0].first_sect = 0;//op->lba; > > > ring_req->seg[0].last_sect = 7;//op->lba + op->count; > > > > > > RING_PUSH_REQUESTS_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY((priv),notify); //return > > notify=0 > > > if(notify){ > > > dprintf(1,"Start notify procedure\n"); > > > evtchn_send_t send; > > > send.port = (bi->port); > > > dprintf(1,"In notify before hypercall port is %d\n",send.port); > > > //hypercall_event_channel_op(EVTCHNOP_send, &send); > > > dprintf(1,"HYPERCALL read operation notify res %d\n", > > > hypercall_event_channel_op(EVTCHNOP_send,&send)); > > > } > > > ring_res = RING_GET_RESPONSE((priv),(temp->rsp_prod)); > > > Then I get: > > > FAIL RING RESPONSE 0x0009a040 id:256 status:9 operation 0 this is > > > the line: > > > dprintf(1,"FAIL RING RESPONSE %p id:%d status:%d operation %d\n", > > > ring_res,ring_res->id,ring_res->status,ring_res->operation); > > > > > > > > > The id should be the same on both the request and response, there > > > are bi ither requests on the fly. > > > > > > Any clue?= > > > > With status happening to be 9 when id should be, is this perhaps a > > broken response structure definition? > > > > That would be my guess too. The structure aligns differently under 64 and 32 > bits so I'd guess the OP is talking between the two. > Further to this, Dom0 sets the "protocol" entry in the frontend xenstore (/local/domain/<domu id>/device/vbd/<vbd id>/protocol) to tell it what alignment it is using. I wrote GPLPV before this setting existed so I solved the problem by sending 2 invalid requests down the ring and checking the response. If the fields have shifted around I assume that dom0 is not the same bit width as the domu and switch structure definitions on the fly. Are you writing a new frontend driver? James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |