[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: "ACPI: Unable to start the ACPI Interpreter"

  • To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Liwei <xieliwei@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 02:23:09 +0800
  • Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:25:09 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=uqexJEartPNeJab7d4E9IDxyNLkONZlEYCr4uHljjLndSkayOJnE8PQwXjjJ9jQXh5 FAVtW6yetJfSS62A0TPmrB6XBcXB3rNffD5qBKgoBddrdROlst1NET+HhdBHzpv7L0uP 1GR0DwXLNpS11PxVMdEqIK+8TD6JK06c5CRAc=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On 28 June 2011 01:33, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hmm. Can you attach the full serial log and on the Linux kernel line have
> 'loglevel=10 debug initcall_debug' please?

See attached.

> Is the serial log when running under 2.6.32 any different? (up to the ACPI 
> interpretter
> blowing up)? What does the /proc/interrupts look under 2.6.32?

There's too much noise for me to compare, but I think they're more or
less the same until the the interpreter blows up for 3.0 whereas
2.6.32 does not.

I've attached the /proc/interrupts dump for both kernel versions. The
difference to note is that IRQ 20 does appear in 2.6.32.

Also attached is the xen dmesg.

Attachment: log-
Description: Binary data

Attachment: log-
Description: Binary data

Attachment: log-3.0-dmesg
Description: Binary data

Attachment: log-3.0-interrupts
Description: Binary data

Attachment: log-xen-dmesg
Description: Binary data

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.