[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v3] replace d->nr_pirqs sized arrays with radix tree

  • To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:28:08 +0100
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:28:47 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Ptk7H76foOD+GUmDgSaX9/61/vi/XlatOh3tE8VuJjWKqPCb8gRVfvbBW/4Fkyepm/ UCJHHxsfDLnuauE8lQc+jrsb6wuyvK5pvu1diyNNldbvx+jrmgg5hLBYr3JCHKl3xT3z EjRyAj65O0cih2IBnBh/qTmaZ4M6311t1MXyA=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcwwH3C2NGxDMMVsr0yR4f0hBVpXUg==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v3] replace d->nr_pirqs sized arrays with radix tree

On 21/06/2011 08:51, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> With this it is questionable whether retaining struct domain's nr_pirqs
> is actually necessary - the value now only serves for bounds checking,
> and this boundary could easily be nr_irqs.
> Note that ia64, the build of which is broken currently anyway, is only
> being partially fixed up.
> v2: adjustments for split setup/teardown of translation data
> v3: re-sync with radix tree implementation changes

What is the reason for rcu-head.h?

 -- Keir

> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.