[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/9] xl: xl block-attach -N (dry run) option
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 12:16 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: [...] > Just the entire structure. [...] > JSON would be a good concrete syntax. [...] > If we had a competent JSON pretty-printer it would do as the > human-readable output too. Should be pretty easy. QMP support in libxl is also going to require a JSON library (for internal use by libxl, not exposed to libxl users), which hopefully has functions which make the pretty part trivial. > We shouldn't be encouraging XML :-). :-D > > What do you think? (I think I lean towards the final option, unless a > > single hardcoded syntax is thought to be sufficient). > > The prototype you suggest is not sufficient because field members may > be structures, so the whole thing needs to be recursive. If you want > reasonable output from a recursive pretty-printer you need to pass an > indent level etc. Oh yeah. Add more params to callback as necessary ;-) Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |