Re: [Xen-devel] Xen dom0 crash: "d0:v0: unhandled page fault (ec=0000)"

[Gianni Tedesco <gianni.tedesco@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 00:31 +0100, Andreas Kinzler wrote:
> On 19.10.2010 17:45, Gianni Tedesco wrote:
> > ditto, I suspected a known bug in my gcc version which broke xchg
> > because when I compiled with -O2 instead of -Os... the problem went away
> > but then something else bad happened later (I forget the details, and it
> > was too many config tweaks ago to get back to last time I had it working
> > that well)
> 
> Jeremy, one user earlier reported that he found out that for him there 
> seems to be a relation between kernel size and crash status. He just 
> added/removed some options that could never influence the "crash status" 
> (like adding/removing netfilter modules). With all the experiences here, 
> is may be useful to check for code paths related to kernel size.
> 
> Regards Andreas

Ah, well that certainly explains why CONFIG_KALLSYMS makes a difference.

Gianni


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel