[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Why reserve maxmem on restore on ia64?


  • To: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:01:16 +0100
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:02:27 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=UXd9RIxEW8WTUwJZatHSXZ5Bzug0/u7cl6KzeKUshQb9unztzvgscjiwpm5H/EgcK6 6DA9aSt6ssVdnopohpY1iTKMp+dxqI/WNUUTXDfAPbwGEFH+CT11WpuAQYAxJJ+CvKz9 XM0PVUzKbb8fQPlVCKkzZueXThB5nO4ZgI3nM=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Actrn+LYjqkIserw+U+rx3Kq4l7s8g==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Why reserve maxmem on restore on ia64?

Because noone has bothered to merge with the x86 restore code, or otherwise
implement the more sensible allocation strategy.

 -- Keir

On 14/10/2010 13:21, "Miroslav Rezanina" <mrezanin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> while checking the code I found out that when we restore guest on ia64
> machine, we reserve up to maxmem pages and than free unused pages. As I'm not
> familiar with ia64 platform, I'd like to ask what's the reason for such a
> behavior? This prevent restoring guest on machine where is not enough memory
> available to alocate maxmem but there's enough memory for alocating memory.
> 
> Thanks for answer,
> Mirek



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.