[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL

To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:48:49 +0100
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 03:49:35 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions 
- FAIL"):
> I think we should try e6b9b2cbca5093e8e38d3e314e2f6415ad951c60. This is
> the commit before e73f4955a821f850f5b88c32d12a81714523a95f which was
> fingered as bad by the xen-unstable bisect yesterday.

Shall I try that with current xen-4.0-testing tip, or with the
changeset I tried last night (pre the netif header backport) ?

It's likely to take all day so it would be nice to pick the right
combination.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Keir Fraser

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Ian Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/15] Nested Virtualization: core
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] xen: pvhvm: allow user to request no emulated device unplug
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.