[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration,
PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc"):
> I wonder if blkfront could register itself with the scsi subsystem
> rather than directly as a block device?
I bet that would mean it would have to deal with SCSI command blocks
and stuff, so I doubt it.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
- References:
- [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
|