|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration,
> PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc"):
> > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Well, no, they can't, because their bootloader probably doesn't
> > > understand anything besides what they're actually using.
> >
> > they only have to change the device name, not the device class
>
> Surely you can't steal only one minor number ?
yes, that's what we do.
>
> > > Certainly stealing the major number for scsi disks seems quite
> > > dangerous. pv-usb is hardly that unlikely a scenario.
> >
> > we are not doing that for pvusb
>
> pv-usb => usb mass storage => scsi disks
I mean there is no such thing as pv-usb.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |