[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: FC Transport layer in xen


  • To: "Mark Williamson" <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Tej <bewith.tej@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:07:25 +0530
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:37:48 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=VoVcng6bqAQEPjWv7TP5YobjmHPPHi8vnoy84WawaT7/HCA29KWQ0p/VGeDrpIsZnL eAO5br6dUTL7zV3WiK3qRwNCtsYKC5BHDiANl0gG30xlB7RMoi/huWm2gLhk70H5//Hw x2/b69N8XfHZ9aRDdUoOEhebDIOx+8fWWX93o=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Mark Williamson
<mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Actually, the PVSCSI *was* mentioned in the 3.3 release announcement so I
> think you should find it there...

yaa i was looking at 3.3 release notes, but i couldn't relate PVSCSCI to it
thanks for this pointers

>
> The header file seems not to have made its way into xen/include/public/io/
> along with the other front/back interface definitions.  It is in the XenLinux
> copy of that directory, though, which I hadn't checked.
>
> 3.3 is probably worth looking at, then ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
> On Saturday 23 August 2008, Tej wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Mark Williamson
>>
>> <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Tej wrote:
>> >> Hi All
>> >>
>> >> As i was referring to the following link
>> >> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-06/msg00996.html
>> >>
>> >> but i can't see this work in official xen 3.2.
>> >> Is it still in review?
>> >
>> > I think I've seen activing reviewing of this patch set fairly recently so
>> > presumably it's still being worked on.  It doesn't look like it's made it
>> > into 3.3, so I guess 3.4 would be the soonest we'd expect it...
>> >
>> >> Or can i use the same patches to perform some NPIV task.
>> >
>> > If you're willing to try experimental software you could probably patch
>> > the code yourself - you might need to be prepared to do some merging in
>> > places if the Xen tree has diverged from the state that the patches
>> > expect...
>> >
>> > You should try to make sure you have the most recent patches possible -
>> > I'm sure they've been updated several times since the mailing list post
>> > that you found.
>>
>> thanks, i will go ahead with the solution.
>>
>> > Cheers,
>> > Mark
>> >
>> >> thanks in advance for any help
>> >>
>> >> -TEJ
>> >
>> > --
>> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool
>> > (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
>
>
>
> --
> Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.