RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Getting rid of xenbus_suspend(): tpmfrontdriverimpacted?

["Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>       > bit cheesy as far as I can see, so something more integrated in the
>       > tpmfront/back protocol would be nice.
> 
>       In terms of time needed for migration there won't be a difference. Is
> supporting that .suspend really so problematic?

Can't you implement the 'exactly-once' semantics you want using some 
higher-level protocol?

The suspend hook clearly can't be called in the case of restarting a driver 
domain. Maybe you don't ever want to do this with tpm, but we do with all the 
other backends.

Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel