Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make delaration and definition of xc_linux_save() the same

[Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 12:14:24PM +0000, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:00:12AM +0000, Horms wrote:
> 
> > 8604:a51fcb5de470 introduced a discrepancy between the declaration
> > and definition of xc_linux_save(). In particular the argument for
> > the suspend pointer to function was null in one and int in the other.
> > On inspection, int seemed to be correct, so I went with this.
> > I also fixed up a few other cosmetic discrepancies.
> > 
> > Signed-Off-By: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks.  I've applied this with s/fd_fd/io_fd, which is what I presume you
> meant.

Yes, indeed. Thanks.

-- 
Horms

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel