[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make delaration and definition of xc_linux_save() the same

[Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

8604:a51fcb5de470 introduced a discrepancy between the declaration
and definition of xc_linux_save(). In particular the argument for
the suspend pointer to function was null in one and int in the other.
On inspection, int seemed to be correct, so I went with this.
I also fixed up a few other cosmetic discrepancies.

Signed-Off-By: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff -r 1b89e2aed730 -r aa6c2e55dea5 tools/libxc/xc_ia64_stubs.c
--- a/tools/libxc/xc_ia64_stubs.c       Thu Jan 12 04:05:05 2006
+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_ia64_stubs.c       Thu Jan 12 06:54:59 2006
@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@
 }
 
 int xc_linux_save(int xc_handle, int io_fd, uint32_t dom, uint32_t max_iters, 
-                  uint32_t max_factor, uint32_t flags, int (*suspend)(void))
+                  uint32_t max_factor, uint32_t flags /* XCFLAGS_xxx */, 
+                 int (*suspend)(int domid))
 {
     PERROR("xc_linux_save not implemented\n");
     return -1;
diff -r 1b89e2aed730 -r aa6c2e55dea5 tools/libxc/xenguest.h
--- a/tools/libxc/xenguest.h    Thu Jan 12 04:05:05 2006
+++ b/tools/libxc/xenguest.h    Thu Jan 12 06:54:59 2006
@@ -21,9 +21,9 @@
  * @parm dom the id of the domain
  * @return 0 on success, -1 on failure
  */
-int xc_linux_save(int xc_handle, int fd, uint32_t dom, uint32_t max_iters, 
+int xc_linux_save(int xc_handle, int fd_fd, uint32_t dom, uint32_t max_iters, 
                   uint32_t max_factor, uint32_t flags /* XCFLAGS_xxx */,
-                  int (*suspend)(int));
+                  int (*suspend)(int domid));
 
 
 /**



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel