[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] connecting dom0 directly to the bridge (was:performance problems...)

  • To: "Goetz Bock" <bock@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:16:10 -0000
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:23:00 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcYXdN63YP8vTF8KTEeLo9FtPHfTuQABUqGQ
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] connecting dom0 directly to the bridge (was:performance problems...)

> On Thu, Jan 12 '06 at 12:24, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > You haven't connected dom0 directly to the bridge rather 
> than vif0.0 
> > to the bridge have you?
> I've been doing that with xen 2.0 and xen 3.0.0, what's bad 
> about doing this?

You shouldn't connect directly if you run services in dom0 for the
domU's. Using vif0.0 prevents a possible deadlock.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.