[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen Virtual Framebuffer



Jon Smirl wrote:

On 12/5/05, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I like Xnest quite a lot.  We need something that's available when X
isn't though (for the VT console for instance).

You certainly don't have to run X on /dev/fb0.  It's mostly to make
text-mode and distro installation a whole lot more user friendly.

Can't distro install into a domain be handled on a virtual serial line
and Linux terminal emulation? This seems like a lot of work to go
through to get something like Redhat's graphical boot working.
I added a section to the Wiki page for discussion of various approachs and the pros/cons. Feel free to extend this information.

So far, the framebuffer has not been all that much code (only a few hundred lines) so I think the benefit from the increased usuability is well worth it.

Thanks for the feedback,

Anthony Liguori

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

However, using remote X is a good option for a number of use-cases so
it's certainly appropriate for certain environments.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Jon Smirl wrote:



I haven't tried playing with X and Xen, but why doesn't it work to
just treat the multiple domains like a network? You run X in dom0 and
give it full access to the video hardware. Then you ssh into each
domain and start X apps, just like you do when using X remotely.
OpenGL will even work this way and be accelerated (as soon as X fixes
indirect acceleration). This model should let you get apps up from
each domain simultaneously on the X display in dom0.

--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx





--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx





--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.