Re: [Xen-devel] problem with direct_remap_pfn_range parameters

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 15 Sep 2005, at 19:08, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:

> sparse/drivers/xen is slowly (but surely) becoming common code
> and direct_remap_pfn_range is called in
> drivers/xen/privcmd/privcmd.c.  Changing that usage
> means changing many other (x86) files, including some that
> call it with &init_mm.  (Is there a parent vma for
> init_mm?)
>
> Or did I misunderstand your point?
My point was garbled. No code outside our sparse tree directly calls 
direct_remap_pfn_range() so we have free reign to define its interface.
 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel