Re: [Xen-devel] Crash

[visik7 <visitors@xxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Keir Fraser wrote:

| After writing my previosu email I've concluded that, even if we fix
|  cli/sti instructions, there are other arch-dependencies that are
| much harder for us to handle automatically, or even with static
| rewriting of the driver binary.
|
| Really, since you are building this driver from source, the correct
|  course of action is to find why it compiled against i386 rather
| than xen architecture. It is probably something really simple:
| e.g., did you build the driver while in native Linuxt and only
| after hat reboot into XenLinux? If you know how, taking a look at
| the compiler command line and Makefiles will probably make it
| fairly obvious how to make the driver look at arch/xen rather than
| arch/i386.
|
| -- Keir
|
|
ok I do the following steps:
compile a kernel linux-2.6.10-xen0 and use it both for dom0 and domU
than after run a domU I get the source of linux-2.6.10-xen0 tree into
/usr/src/linux-2.6.10 (getting also linux-2.6.10-xen-sparse and
putting it in the same dir of the source (so no broken links))
after doing this I compiled my driver against this source
I check the source tree of the module but there aren't no explicit
reference to i386
thankyou
~    Marco
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCIlvTihYL426P5W4RAkErAJ9+h9J1ZF0N3aSeFq+S1437IvKLHQCfSvAD
+al2WPxpY2sr0wqXjMfE8HI=
=HNSj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel