[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] unstable or 1.1rc? ReiserFS?

  • To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Gregory Newby" <newby@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:39:17 -0900
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:40:27 +0000
  • List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>

Two quickies for the Xen developers:

1. Are you putting code changes into both the 1.1rc and
-unstable code base?  If not, which one is getting all
the patches that Bin and others have been applying?

2. Awhile ago, I thought that Kurt added ReiserFS support
by default to the Xen kernel (2.4.22 tree's .config).  This
doesn't seem to be there now, but I'd like to urge you to consider
adding it by default.  It doesn't add much size to the kernel
image, and seems like a no-brainer to enable.

I want to go and hit someone at RedHat over the head with
a cluebat for not enabling ReiserFS, and take the 
same cluebat to someone at SuSE for not enabling ext3.

Thanks!  Greg

This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.