Re: [Wg-test-framework] Baroque 0/1 Status

["Paul L. George" <pgeorge@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian, 

Paul L. George writes ("Re: Baroque 0/1 Status"):
> We only removed Baroque 1, and replaced the motherboard in the system.  
> We had to go to the latest updated versions of the BIOS and Chip set 
> Firmware.  Ray took a picture of the motherboard before he removed the 
> old board so the wiring would be correct.  Only after the update was 
> completed did we pull Baroque 0 back from the COLO.
> We had to perform the same updates to make them identical.

How can you explain this, then:

> >
baroque0           baroque1
> > 
> > NIC1 MAC recorded in ansible,   00:1e:67:99:42:9d  00:1e:67:99:46:e4
> > from before hardware work (also
> > visible in old serial logs)
> > 
> > NIC1 MAC reported by BIOS,      00:1e:67:af:e4:34  00:1e:67:99:46:e4
> > now, after hardware work

?

Perhaps the labels on the two machines disagree with the physical wiring.

Either that or the wiring was wrong.  In any case I will have INTEL ship the
RMA return back to me and we will swap motherboards.  Tell me how you want
the I/O devices wired.  I will verify the wiring and the labels.  I will not
know why there was a mix up until I retrieve the servers from the COLO.
I'll trace the Serial and Ethernet cables to make sure they match the
diagram.

Paul 



_______________________________________________
Wg-test-framework mailing list
Wg-test-framework@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wg-test-framework