Re: [Wg-test-framework] Lenovo issue

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Don Koch writes ("Re: [Wg-test-framework] Lenovo issue"):
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:14:34 -0400
> Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Please can you confirm:

Thanks Ian for asking the questions the right way.

> >      2. That the first physical non-management Ethernet port is also
> >         wired into the switch.
> 
> No, the second one is (based on MAC addresses).

I gues we can live with this.

> >      3. The precise MAC address associated with both of those, in those
> >         terms (not in terms of the names Linux might have chosen, nor
> >         whatever might or might not be stencilled on the case)
> 
> For huxelrebe0:
>   port 0: 44:39:c4:6d:20:4d
>   port 1: 44:39:c4:6d:20:4e
>   port 2 (mgmt): 44:39:c4:39:a1:26
> 
> For huxelrebe1:
>   port 0: 44:39:c4:6d:20:5f
>   port 1: 44:39:c4:6d:20:60
>   port 2 (mgmt): 44:39:c4:39:a1:19

Thank you.

> >              B. the management port is not visible to the Operating
> >                 System.
> 
> No. It shows up as a third ethernet device (coincidentally as eth2 on
> both). I don't think it can be turned off. I would hope that this
> shouldn't matter.

It's not ideal but I think we can probably prevent d-i from trying to
use it with appropriate osstest configuration.

> >              C. the non-management port is configured solely for the use
> >                 of the Operating System and will never be interfered
> >                 with by any BIOS activity;
> 
> Yes. (s/port is/ports are/)

Thanks.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Wg-test-framework mailing list
Wg-test-framework@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wg-test-framework