Re: [Wg-test-framework] Lenovo issue

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Don Koch writes ("Re: [Wg-test-framework] Lenovo issue"):
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:13:50 -0400
> > Can you please confirm:
> > 
> >  * Which physical ports on the machine AMT has been set up on ?
> >    AIUI the machines have three ports: eth0, eth1 and the management
> >    port.  I think we should be using the management port.
> 
> AIUI: the management port is shared with the machine currently showing up as 
> eth2.

You mean the back of the machine only has two physical ethernet
ports ?

Is it possible to dedicate eth2 to AMT ?  I am quite unhappy with port
sharing which seems likely to cause all sorts of unwanted excitement.

> For whatever reason, the normal ports are on eth1. Eth0 is unassigned.
> huxelrebe0:
> 172.16.144.38 at 44:39:c4:39:a1:26 = eth2

iwj@OSSTEST:~$ telnet 172.16.144.38 5900
Trying 172.16.144.38...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused

...

Wait, I have just tried this from the infrastructure VM, where I can
get a tcp connection.

> huxelrebe1:
> 172.16.144.250 at 44:39:c4:39:a1:19 = eth2

(with port forwarded ssh -L 5901:172.16.144.250:5900):

mariner:~> xvnc4viewer localhost:1

VNC Viewer Free Edition 4.1.1 for X - built Feb  4 2013 16:56:44
Copyright (C) 2002-2005 RealVNC Ltd.
See http://www.realvnc.com for information on VNC.

Tue Apr 21 18:26:19 2015
 CConn:       connected to host localhost port 5901
 CConnection: Server supports RFB protocol version 4.0
 CConnection: Using RFB protocol version 3.8
Password: 
Tue Apr 21 18:26:29 2015
 main:        Error: 0x80862E00: Client authentication failure

mariner:~>

This is the same VNC viewer that I used successfully during the
phone call last week.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Wg-test-framework mailing list
Wg-test-framework@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wg-test-framework