 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] High Number of VMs
| To: | xen-users list <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] High Number of VMs |
| From: | Ciro Iriarte <cyruspy@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:28:23 -0400 |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 14 Sep 2011 05:29:26 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CXFOG/MkPhUEOIR1WxmqSsdTLbKLBc71PKzsVIEbQ94=; b=HrOcyu/UJZ3RgpgLakpvmAOUuOqGUM/PHaBV8Z87qGmmszHhNBdJWakBmXDKJmqPxO kLA21df9kUiT7h2qeEEvmz4dV+6ygvLu0zL82paXCev8IIJYNZgMC2AX4MfCKGCkJ+aa OYxhkEsU0B4yQOzKqf5MLFt3byUBeuFEUU7Wg= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4E6F7739.7010809@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <CAEaLa5F=T-M2tFYrVjpoSF820b_YsyFX3pFSUMBheJdOxj5xxg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E6A8A4D.7050204@xxxxxxxxxxx> <CAEaLa5GppzZ9CyC=uQSu677F78O4fk_MhHGJwY0hpAOfEfU4Mg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E6F7739.7010809@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
2011/9/13 John Madden <jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> Any advantage on using large luns+LVM instead of independent LUNs >> appart from snapshots? (according to Novell support LVM on top of LVM >> is a bad thing...). I remember reading that Xen itself implements some >> kind of locking... > > I think easier management is the key. If you're already managing the SAN > and assigning LUNs to your boxen, then managing multipath.conf across your > cluster, it's nice to only do that 4 times for a couple TB rather than once > for each VM, for example. > > John Csync2 is your friend here :) Regards, -- Ciro Iriarte http://cyruspy.wordpress.com -- _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: Virtualization Test Day for F16 and Xen, Pasi Kärkkäinen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-API] Fedora 16 Virtualization Test Day!, Lars Kurth |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] High Number of VMs, Christian Motschke |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-users] High Number of VMs, James Harper |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
