|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.39 - what Xen components went
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 09:34:43AM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>
> Friday, May 13, 2011, 6:49:27 PM, you wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:46:18AM +1000, Joseph Glanville wrote:
> >> Great work everyone. :)
>
> > Combined with this week acceptance of Xen in upstream QEMU, and I think
> > that the majority of folks on xen-devel are going to have a hard hangover
> > on Monday :-)
>
> Cheers and thx all ! :-)
>
> >>
> >> I assume this means that drivers/block/xen-blkback.c is the last major
> >> milestone to be pushed upstream?
>
> > There are also some semi-major ones, but right now the xen-blkback is
> > important
> > since it provides so much more performance benefit than the QEMU one.
>
> A semi one for me personally would be acpi-processor stuff to make xenpm work.
> But having blkback would make it at least ok to test for some longer period
> :-)
>
At Xen Hack-a-tron two months ago Jeremy was mentioning pvops acpi patches..
Jeremy: Any plans for submitting those upstream?
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|