WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.39 - what Xen components went in.

To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.39 - what Xen components went in.
From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 09:34:43 +0200
Cc: Joseph Glanville <joseph.glanville@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 14 May 2011 00:36:05 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110513164927.GA18484@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eikelenboom IT services
References: <20110513143615.GA16193@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTim_hgQ2qPWr9aZ8OtTrurz4LqA=jw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110513164927.GA18484@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Friday, May 13, 2011, 6:49:27 PM, you wrote:

> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:46:18AM +1000, Joseph Glanville wrote:
>> Great work everyone. :)

> Combined with this week acceptance of Xen in upstream QEMU, and I think
> that the majority of folks on xen-devel are going to have a hard hangover
> on Monday :-)

Cheers and thx all ! :-)

>> 
>> I assume this means that drivers/block/xen-blkback.c is the last major
>> milestone to be pushed upstream?

> There are also some semi-major ones, but right now the xen-blkback is 
> important
> since it provides so much more performance benefit than the QEMU one.

A semi one for me personally would be acpi-processor stuff to make xenpm work.
But having blkback would make it at least ok to test for some longer period :-)

--
Sander


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users