WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs

from [Christian Zoffoli] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
From: Christian Zoffoli <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:39:12 +0100
Cc: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 11:40:43 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110129185303.GO2754@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4D4032C7.9000003@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTin+K5G10_03qLRT_yqCRELu339roLEHy1bVFoqR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D4064CD.8010005@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB9292@trantor> <4D409BC4.6010800@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20110129150805.GE2754@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4D443F3E.5090803@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20110129163745.GH2754@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4D445BF3.3070509@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20110129184652.GM2754@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20110129185303.GO2754@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110105 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 
Il 29/01/2011 19:53, Pasi Kärkkäinen ha scritto:
[cut]

thanks for the links

[cut]
>> Say, 12500 IOPS, will cause 1% cpu usage, when scaling linearly
>> from Intel+Microsoft results.

I've seen many iSCSI implementations and noone gives me 12500 IOPS with
1% cpu usage ...I would be happy to see a real setup with such performances.


Christian

P.S. real means = something I could put in production without storing
VMs in memory

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [Xen-devel] Nvidia 9500GT Xen VGA passthru, Pasi Kärkkäinen
Next by Date:  Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Pasi Kärkkäinen
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Pasi Kärkkäinen
Next by Thread:  Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Pasi Kärkkäinen
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy