WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs

from [Javier Guerra Giraldez] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Christian Zoffoli <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
From: Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:33:57 -0500
Cc: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Roberto Bifulco <roberto.bifulco2@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:36:30 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4D409BC4.6010800@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <994429490908070648s69eed40eua19efc43c3eb85a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3FF9BC.40601@xxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.4007da378a.AANLkTiku=-RhcyUZVHmwnJ18+Az6Fk5CxdEjKdHQKJ54@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D4032C7.9000003@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTin+K5G10_03qLRT_yqCRELu339roLEHy1bVFoqR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D40424B.4090808@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTinRdUNC-4PNsF=sKtUvm7SBRc=-LnYX9S8rYTHG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D4064CD.8010005@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB9292@trantor> <4D409BC4.6010800@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Christian Zoffoli <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Every new entry level storage is based on std hardware without any hw
> acceleration ...for example EMC AX storages are simply xeon servers.

TCP offloading is quite standard on most GbE chips.  even iSCSI
offloading is pretty common.  I'd be surprised if EMC wouldn't take
advantage of that.

-- 
Javier

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli
Next by Date:  Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Marcin Kuk
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli
Next by Thread:  Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy