Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs

To:	James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
From:	Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:35:53 -0500
Cc:	yue <ooolinux@xxxxxxx>, Christian Zoffoli <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:36:58 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB930D@trantor>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<4D408069.9000302@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4D40079D.4070407@xxxxxxxxxxx> <994429490908070648s69eed40eua19efc43c3eb85a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7bc80d500908070700s7050c766g4d1c6af2cd71ea89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <994429490908070711q4c64f92au9baa6577524e5c5d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3463f63d0908070726y630d320u3e3f1f1cae9b34a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.0007322cfd.AANLkTi=2S3bKf6jv9BbqYMbkWFbjJTrpYh8GK2EGXGns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3FD940.1090000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1b04b04.e81d.12dc316a0d6.Coremail.ooolinux@xxxxxxx> <181df34.9ec5.12dcb739a09.Coremail.ooolinux@xxxxxxx> <4D42A107.60702@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTinRjnLtgpL69zn8N75rB8EMqVS5Rs3zY=Pznwuy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB930D@trantor>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:31 PM, James Harper
<james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Microsoft achieve high performance with their cluster filesystem. In fact the 
> docs clearly state it's only reliable for Hyper-V virtual disks, any other 
> use could cause problems, so I assume they get around the metadata locking 
> problem by isolating each disk file so there are no (or minimal) shared 
> resources.

sounds like the original OCFS, (not ocfs2), which was only usable for oracle RAC

-- 
Javier

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, James Harper

Next by Date:

[Xen-users] XCP - Import XVA images to XCP 1.0 ?, Outback Dingo

Previous by Thread:

RE: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, James Harper

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Pasi Kärkkäinen

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs