WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs

To: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
From: Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:35:53 -0500
Cc: yue <ooolinux@xxxxxxx>, Christian Zoffoli <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:36:58 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB930D@trantor>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4D408069.9000302@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4D40079D.4070407@xxxxxxxxxxx> <994429490908070648s69eed40eua19efc43c3eb85a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7bc80d500908070700s7050c766g4d1c6af2cd71ea89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <994429490908070711q4c64f92au9baa6577524e5c5d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3463f63d0908070726y630d320u3e3f1f1cae9b34a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.0007322cfd.AANLkTi=2S3bKf6jv9BbqYMbkWFbjJTrpYh8GK2EGXGns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3FD940.1090000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1b04b04.e81d.12dc316a0d6.Coremail.ooolinux@xxxxxxx> <181df34.9ec5.12dcb739a09.Coremail.ooolinux@xxxxxxx> <4D42A107.60702@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTinRjnLtgpL69zn8N75rB8EMqVS5Rs3zY=Pznwuy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB930D@trantor>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:31 PM, James Harper
<james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Microsoft achieve high performance with their cluster filesystem. In fact the 
> docs clearly state it's only reliable for Hyper-V virtual disks, any other 
> use could cause problems, so I assume they get around the metadata locking 
> problem by isolating each disk file so there are no (or minimal) shared 
> resources.

sounds like the original OCFS, (not ocfs2), which was only usable for oracle RAC

-- 
Javier

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users