WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/

Home

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re:Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs

from [yue]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	"Christian Zoffoli" <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re:Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
From:	yue <ooolinux@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:08:27 +0800 (CST)
Cc:	"xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:09:56 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4D408069.9000302@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<4D408069.9000302@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4D40079D.4070407@xxxxxxxxxxx> <994429490908070648s69eed40eua19efc43c3eb85a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7bc80d500908070700s7050c766g4d1c6af2cd71ea89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <994429490908070711q4c64f92au9baa6577524e5c5d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3463f63d0908070726y630d320u3e3f1f1cae9b34a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.0007322cfd.AANLkTi=2S3bKf6jv9BbqYMbkWFbjJTrpYh8GK2EGXGns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3FD940.1090000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1b04b04.e81d.12dc316a0d6.Coremail.ooolinux@xxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

what is the performance of clvm+ocfs2?

stability,?


At 2011-01-27 04:13:29，"Christian Zoffoli" <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Il 26/01/2011 17:09, yue ha scritto:
>>  CLVM and GFS2 ,could tell  how you deploy?
>> more details  are expected.
>
>install pacemaker, corosync, clvm compiled for the new stack and gfs2
>...but IMHO gfs2 is not stable enought ...gfs is stable but too old.
>
>OCFS2 is more interesting for xen vm hosting ...check "OCFS2 reflink"
>keywords
>
>
>Christian

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, (continued) Message not available RE: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Matej Zary Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, riki Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Rudi Ahlers Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, riki Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Jonathan Tripathy Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, riki Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Juergen Gotteswinter Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Jonathan Tripathy Re:Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, yue Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli Re:Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, yue <= Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Javier Guerra Giraldez RE: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, James Harper Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Javier Guerra Giraldez Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Pasi Kärkkäinen Re:Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, yue Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Rudi Ahlers Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Roberto Bifulco

Previous by Date:	Re:Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, yue
Next by Date:	Re: [Xen-users] Consistent VM image backups, Simon Hobson
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli
Next by Thread:	Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

This site is hosted by Citrix