Re: [Xen-users] Which version for hosting?

To:	Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] Which version for hosting?
From:	Ian Murray <murrayie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 16 Jan 2011 10:35:51 +0000 (GMT)
Cc:
Delivery-date:	Sun, 16 Jan 2011 02:36:57 -0800
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1295174151; bh=hS5QdM9HDQ2xiLFlLcec3krrq5NISly6f1JO1vXm6MU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=KEH6D/MGmKZLsr4znHf8nIoUox2557jJjP4Zjna5NlMLH6aIb6h5x3yiV3Qumh+NSadZdKKkJpabA/qQiNJHf484AosrxZkF///7kaWUCcGKLfS6hAL4+4+QgikqmQCd2LFhwlVT+cenHTFkby1ZKFXWkt5+DTZVbe3seGqXrGg=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=qq/QYkff01ZCtbZotizKXR9TSFdbqgwODcp6lpCz52GQwmsIE7iDylWuKqeOAPKk7aW+f2qTl1bf+5sv8ebEjVvPCmy9i6vzi2Cz8yycMbN/70vFeG9zYaPhd5nNYm26WUTEnlFX+SrzN10UbDkbBovM3151V2+7XGFPDcDu810=;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20110115182915.GB2754@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<4D2E20E9.4040703@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20110115124416.GZ2754@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4D31E628.9020608@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20110115182915.GB2754@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> In general Xen 4.0 works with 2.6.18 based  dom0 kernel aswell.
> Try it and see how it goes with the el5 kernel  :)
> 
> I know gitco.de guys had some problems with the el5 dom0  kernel,
> but those might be already resolved.
> 


I had problems with xendomains failing to save and restore domains on 
startup/shutdown using 4.0 and the Gitco 2.6.18. Other than that, it seemed 
alright. I reverted back to 3.4.3 because xendomains would fail to restore and 
fail to auto-start them, as they were left in a broken state after the 
attempted 
restore. Xen 3.4.3 + CentOS's 2.6.18 was a rock solid combination, 

Good luck getting pv_ops 2.6.32.27 +4.0.1 reliably working on CentOS 5.5. So 
far, it has been quite problematic for me.




_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Which version for hosting?