This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] Which distro to use for Dom0

On 1/12/2011 11:35 AM, Digimer wrote:
On 01/12/2011 12:12 PM, Donny Brooks wrote:
On 1/12/2011 11:06 AM, Donny Brooks wrote:
On 1/12/2011 10:59 AM, Digimer wrote:
On 01/12/2011 11:55 AM, Donny Brooks wrote:
I am not worried about the xen version really. I have 4.0 on centos
currently from the third party repo. I mainly need whatever supports
best live/auto migration. Basically if I have a server fail I need
whatever was running on it to switch to the backup server

Food for thought: What would be the difference in the above support
between Ubuntu/Debian and Fedora 14?
Automatic VM migration in a failure would best be achieved with a 2-node
cluster. Fedora 14 would be best there, as I believe most of the
developers of Pacemaker and RHCS use Fedora/RHEL. At the least, it's
pretty RPM-centric, then gets ported to .deb's.

That in and of itself is not always the best argument though. It was
enough to make me switch from Debian/Ubuntu to RHEL (CentOS)/Fedora

Thanks for the input. Currently we do not have any form of auto
failover so that is a must moving forward. So is pacemaker the best
way to provide auto failover with xen 4.0?

Xen-users mailing list
Also, where would XCP come into play with this? Is it something I should
I don't use XCP, so I can't comment on that.

As for clustering; Pacemaker will be the main clustered resource manager
going forward (rgmanager from RHCS is now being migrated away). I've
just started this move myself, but I do think that there are well tested
Xen OCF scripts for managing Xen VMs.

The setup you will want to look at is:
- RHEL 6 (Fedora 14/CentOS 6)
- Corosync + Pacemaker (cluster core + resource manager)
- Fencing (aka Stonith) device (IPMI, PDU, etc)
- DRBD if you don't have/want a SAN
- qdisk for proper quorum support

Thanks for that. So far I am leaning toward Fedora 14. The Centos cycle is too long and usually has packages that are way out of the range I need (for instance OpenLDAP on my Centos 5.5 is way too old to enable the ppolicy stuff I need even though the release is not that old). I will look into the other software now.

What about a web based administration or domu creation? Are there any that work well with Xen and both paravirt/full-virt domu's?

Donny B.

Xen-users mailing list