WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel
From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 04:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 04:42:48 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1287661252; bh=49f+X7pyFizllsMHZb+E+uBTv45t5wbNzDWK68MePYI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=D4PWX3HdaHJHb+FlnFUFGoQg1dSK5+1KCWQA4akfq9taEAQsmJO/pEbzaC2h0cLyl1gwTyC66SuvXeMbyQW1kNYegRUS3KIgcjjjLGbRWkBdmaVVRm8EZLsapdHgff0WB3nhN+rbtkPPo5KGugWeJp+4TTLnhuJAkBcdDCt0dxM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TRbgPrFprbLeD/Apg224hoFhBZNl9ux4HELsW1UOyPhRd9XYuBWyNpM5IGsyDZXI9HU3jszfc1U1OfH5FeU3oP+BpuEqXb/Ck1u06piWzQmDwWej7ViBvd1vluMZG6Nmt0u/QPZXkzlX0mF1EMqiptj7cfOh0yYvVwqgYd7TrBI=;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <887754.73568.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Actually, i would be glad to be wrong about performance numbers.
Following bellow is how i set up 2.6.34.7 as bzImage under Xen 4.0.1
on top of Ubuntu 10.10 ( Server or Desktop).

http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2010/10/17/xenlinux-kernel-2-6-34-7-aka-suse-under-xen-4-0-1-on-top-of-ubuntu-10-10-desktop/

Boris.

--- On Thu, 10/21/10, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-users] Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel
To: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx>
Cc: xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 1:49 AM


> - How did you measure this performance difference?
     Database server running on  PV DomU with intensive I/O.
     Workload connected with loading and unloading tables
     to/from ASCII files residing on the guest's  image.
 > - Did you make sure kernel configuration is similar for both kernel types?
 > Many pvops .configs have various debugging options enabled that kill the performance..

It's my personal impression. I am not an expert in PVOPS config tuning, but
try to avoid debugging options.

Boris.

--- On Wed, 10/20/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:

From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 1:42 PM

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 07:49:29AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>    Just wondering why [1]kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm cannot
>    make itself
>    into F14. It seems pretty stable. Why it cannot be just a package
>    available via "yum install" . Anyway Fedora's Libvirt has the best
>    compatibility with Xen 4.0.1.
>    It's not too late switch back to Xen with PVOPS kernel. XenLinux 2.6.34.7
>    aka Suse
>    is really dangerous . It outperforms pvops kernel about 15-20 % under Xen
>    4.0.1.
>

- How did you measure this performance difference?
- Did you make sure kernel configuration is similar for both kernel types?
Many pvops .configs have various debugging options enabled that kill the performance..

-- Pasi

>    I don't mention KVM performance. It's not a competitor for OpenSuse 11.3
>    after the
>    most recent "zypper update"
>
>    Boris.
>
>    --- On Mon, 10/18/10, M A Young <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>      From: M A Young <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>      Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build
>      To: xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>      Date: Monday, October 18, 2010, 6:17 AM
>
>      There is less urgency to test now because 4.0.1-6.fc14 has now made it
>      into F14 in time for the release. You can of course continue to test if
>      you want to.
>
>          Michael Young
>      --
>      xen mailing list
>      [2]xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>      [3]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen
>
> References
>
>    Visible links
>    1. http://fedorapeople.org/%7Emyoung/dom0/src/kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm
>    2. file:///mc/compose?to=xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    3. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen

> --
> xen mailing list
> xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users