| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
[Xen-users] Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 07:49:29AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> Just wondering why [1]kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm cannot
> make itself
> into F14. It seems pretty stable. Why it cannot be just a package
> available via "yum install" . Anyway Fedora's Libvirt has the best
> compatibility with Xen 4.0.1.
> It's not too late switch back to Xen with PVOPS kernel. XenLinux 2.6.34.7
> aka Suse
> is really dangerous . It outperforms pvops kernel about 15-20 % under Xen
> 4.0.1.
>
- How did you measure this performance difference?
- Did you make sure kernel configuration is similar for both kernel types?
Many pvops .configs have various debugging options enabled that kill the
performance..
-- Pasi
> I don't mention KVM performance. It's not a competitor for OpenSuse 11.3
> after the
> most recent "zypper update"
>
> Boris.
>
> --- On Mon, 10/18/10, M A Young <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: M A Young <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build
> To: xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Monday, October 18, 2010, 6:17 AM
>
> There is less urgency to test now because 4.0.1-6.fc14 has now made it
> into F14 in time for the release. You can of course continue to test if
> you want to.
>
> Michael Young
> --
> xen mailing list
> [2]xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [3]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen
>
> References
>
> Visible links
> 1.
> http://fedorapeople.org/%7Emyoung/dom0/src/kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm
> 2. file:///mc/compose?to=xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 3. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen
> --
> xen mailing list
> xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home