Re: [Xen-users] one busy vm affects other vm

To:	George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] one busy vm affects other vm
From:	Aclhk Aclhk <aclhkaclhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:10:56 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1282712978; bh=psHFkh3rH/Csv++D2NmGZ92+9hSEheqVfhIDjL4zhAw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=s40qJAaQNj0io8SgATk8enolybZvPTzV3VBLeEXf5sgcPVDnRFT5Wy4ZTXIb2YUwJ+SSKcEN1A067C6/7cHk9fOCKadfW5SkX2RJHPtdE4KQXFcWvc0XjwdOIexgca5KoPgyf6e5wYzdUywxOf2ld8zHHjB7dLsX1rNPghzro0E=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ymail.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CtUtIXvN+WOcTBhgjgST8FxUctPVJxwuD9ng2mDcQcntdnU+SnoFuVOfMkQAnDx41uqBgoPYuZrINprzn0ksAvxOqn7OZqcg33fs0mzE/nVWd/yTnJjsuA3GMT8D9JP8i3G3OianPflHdRwXau/dF3f0oRXoA8g4H4WzGRxAYAo=;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<1280942433.12792.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

could we cap the host cpu utilisation so it would not affect VMs?

--- 2010年8月4日星期三，George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx> 寫道﹕

寄件人: George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>
主題: Re: [Xen-users] one busy vm affects other vm
收件人: "Aclhk Aclhk" <aclhkaclhk@xxxxxxxxx>
副本(CC): xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
日期: 2010年8月4日,星期三,下午5:20

Well I saw those problems when running cpuburn... After few iteration I
solve it (not sure) by using CPU cap 99%.

В Срд, 04/08/2010 в 04:25 -0700, Aclhk Aclhk пишет:
> the affected VMs are all linux (centos 5.4) hvm but windows (win2k)
> hvm not affected.
>    I am using Xen 3.1.0 in centos 5.4
>
>    I have one VM consuming 100% cpu and all other VM (linux)
>    become very slow (no ssh and vnc access).
>
>    I could access host via ssh but not VM. host cpu is about 95%
>    idle using dstat.
>
>    Pls advise how to avoid this.
>
>
>
>
>    -----內含下列附件-----
>
>    _______________________________________________
>    Xen-users mailing list
>    Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Previous by Date:	[Xen-users] Monitoring Xen with Zabbix.., Michael March
Next by Date:	Re: [Xen-users] Firewall rules, Rudi Ahlers
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Xen-users] one busy vm affects other vm, George Shuklin
Next by Thread:	[Xen-users] XenStore, Jonathan Tripathy
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] one busy vm affects other vm