 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] one busy vm affects other vm
| To: | Aclhk Aclhk <aclhkaclhk@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] one busy vm affects other vm |
| From: | George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:20:33 +0400 |
| Cc: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:22:37 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TdhYt4rKmSJrwVeJ0nA3D6leYibfliBGSCFqIBAXiXk=; b=WvZF5T3t8nVTYvL3sbYZS/EfjACV348p/VlObJfRuIMIXwJgjEqsklYToMLd5JHLsr /ujsA9Ac1VUQKy9JqxkZHb23h74xlm4q3bPErDwmevwjy7+bxqHE6DRal5NF7ln3CGLW oAz41QE1DmUA7rle9tnztLy33l/cEFaMwChhM= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=Yh6Gx59CO8APFL33v/6A/sMw54CfDxnxQPMZCgIlHnvyNpTJoAZe5RUy3f0E+SB7JD Age5p6JGwrjDLluRQ45MuHKOr30UKfrXdreG1mrBSk8R5VCGXRCXrdVWuykxPFFYGykB RuXwoa4MCvQ2qKzFlYEh/2yjUHulGhBouwmXs= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <362931.38760.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <362931.38760.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Well I saw those problems when running cpuburn... After few iteration I solve it (not sure) by using CPU cap 99%. В Срд, 04/08/2010 в 04:25 -0700, Aclhk Aclhk пишет: > the affected VMs are all linux (centos 5.4) hvm but windows (win2k) > hvm not affected. > I am using Xen 3.1.0 in centos 5.4 > > I have one VM consuming 100% cpu and all other VM (linux) > become very slow (no ssh and vnc access). > > I could access host via ssh but not VM. host cpu is about 95% > idle using dstat. > > Pls advise how to avoid this. > > > > > -----內含下列附件----- > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] How to patch 2.6.34-12-xen on Suse 11.3 ? ( udev 157 issue) - XEN4.0 & 11.3 - Unable to open connection to hypervisor URI, Michael Cook |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] How to patch 2.6.34-12-xen on Suse 11.3 ? ( udev 157 issue) - XEN4.0 & 11.3 - Unable to open connection to hypervisor URI, Michael Cook |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] one busy vm affects other vm, Aclhk Aclhk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] one busy vm affects other vm, Aclhk Aclhk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
