Re: [Xen-users] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts

To:	Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
From:	francisco javier funes nieto <esencia@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:06:04 +0100
Cc:	xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:06:45 -0800
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ss4NT72+Bfr91vpMQXKgYGbSAAsH/uke8saAWuiYPDQ=; b=Gg6hHPo0xpXhrRwbeocM+7Vsunki9RtnPrFj7uUhpsm5VstT8yINE0RStLPTpmZFlJ Glj9Ft5FAdZ38Am9S+ApvL+cVwn4ETYvm3RJ5OvUw+EcjKzze4dLLZdMq3HzYHYKzwWU 9ha/PpFfP2om/F+S9w9sP4apLwFYVYqGm4/CI=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fbpULHGd4i029dIK0HwIKXDXDzGkomnlTIbdIPtCAqdugQJMgBXagNTf8AknQf6SqV 1GguLV2m9Sun09kywNtVdItRt+myrpOJu/+rvUKITcVSTAEYRDiId2Xvq5dNfewq8dfI aPiJTMAAh0T0zoOhb2Sq3//FIvaiA+L7zL1hw=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<695200da1001280359v170136fby1756c6bb0221a5f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<695200da1001280330r6720970ay8551dd709969d50e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <30cf90751001280347o469d78ddx60371bd9999d2569@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <695200da1001280359v170136fby1756c6bb0221a5f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You can use Bacula too (for a complete backup solution) with encrypted
communication provided by TLS.

It's a great piece of software! I've worked with it since 1.38 version.

http://www.bacula.org
http://bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Bacula_TLS_Communications.html


2010/1/28 Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:47 PM, francisco javier funes nieto
> <esencia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe SSHFS?  http://fuse.sourceforge.net/sshfs.html
>>
>> I didn't used it, but it's here! ;-)
>>
>> J.
>>
>>
>>  ________
>>
>> Francisco Javier Funes Nieto [esencia@xxxxxxxxx]
>> CANONIGOS
>> Servicios Informáticos para PYMES.
>> Cl. Cruz 2, 1º Oficina 7
>> Tlf: 958.536759 / 661134556
>> Fax: 958.521354
>> GRANADA - 18002
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>
>
> Thanx, I did try it, and it needs extra kernel modules to be installed,
> which is sometimes a problem with the client's domU's. i.e. when they
> rebuild the domU's, then we need to manually add the extra kernel modules -
> so it creates extra load ofn the support techs.
> --
> Kind Regards
> Rudi Ahlers
> SoftDux
>
> Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
> Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
> Office: 087 805 9573
> Cell: 082 554 7532
>



-- 
_____________________________________________

Francisco Javier Funes Nieto [esencia@xxxxxxxxx]
CANONIGOS
Servicios Informáticos para PYMES.
Cl. Cruz 2, 1º Oficina 7
Tlf: 958.536759 / 661134556
Fax: 958.521354
GRANADA - 18002

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts