WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] hardware recommendations please

To: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] hardware recommendations please
From: Florian Manschwetus <florianmanschwetus@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:41:15 +0100
Cc: Chris Fanning <christopher.fanning@xxxxxxxxx>, Xen users mailing list <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 08:42:07 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87463.78952.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <87463.78952.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090930 Thunderbird/3.0b4
Am 25.10.2009 15:59, schrieb Boris Derzhavets:
> Box is really nice.
> 
> Thanks.
> Boris
> 
Take a serious look at ILOM feature it is unique in x86 world.

Florian


> --- On *Sun, 10/25/09, Florian Manschwetus
> /<florianmanschwetus@xxxxxx>/* wrote:
> 
> 
>     From: Florian Manschwetus <florianmanschwetus@xxxxxx>
>     Subject: Re: [Xen-users] hardware recommendations please
>     To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>     Cc: "Chris Fanning" <christopher.fanning@xxxxxxxxx>, "Xen users
>     mailing list" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Date: Sunday, October 25, 2009, 9:19 AM
> 
>     Am 25.10.2009 11:17, schrieb Boris Derzhavets:
>     >>If you really like to have a Server, then you should take a
>     serious look
>     >>at Sun X86 hardware, for example the X4170 would be a great peace of
>     >>hardware for running xen as server virtualisation. Even more for
>     remote
>     >>usage.
>     >
>     It is a Intel Nehalem Xeon Server why should it refuse Windows or
>     Linux???
> 
>     > If customer doesn't want to run OpenSolaris 2010-02-125 or SNV 124 for
>     > Xen Virtualization in meantime :-
>     >
>     > 1. Would it be possible to install F11 or Ubuntu 9.04 Server on
>     this box ?
>     It is a normal intel xeon server, every x86 architecture os will run on
>     it (as far as it supports 16 Threads (windows xp may fail here))
>     > 2. Would it be possible  port Xen-unstable or Xen-3.4.2 via
>     > xensource.com  or
>     As above is it possible with a Nehalem based Server of IBM or HP Brand?
>     > build Xen Dom0 via xen-3.4.1-5.fc12.src.rpm along with the most recent
>     > Libvirt 0.7.0
>     > with xen driver ( on F11).
>     s.a.
>     > 3. Would it be possible  clone JF's Git Repo to this box and build the
>     > most recent
>     >    pvops kernel ?
>     damn why should a x86 os behave differently just because it runs on a
>     Box Sun labeled?
>     > 4.Would it be possible to build the most recent xenified 2.6.31.4
>     aka Suse ?
>     >
>     s.a.
>     > In other words,  are you aware of Linux Xen performance on mentioned
>     > hardware
>     > from Sun ?
>     >
>     I have tested the x4150 boxes myself with a normal x86_64 gentoo xen, it
>     is perfect.
>     > Boris.
>     >
> 
>     Florian
> 
> 


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>