WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] Xen Performance

To: "Amir Maqbool Ahmed" <AmirM.Ahmed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Xen Performance
From: "Robert Dunkley" <Robert@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:20:06 +0100
Cc:
Delivery-date: Tue, 26 May 2009 07:33:26 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E1M8Agp-000247-7j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcneC+7I4wm0iGOST+qYOi65rfDGqwAACAFQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Xen Performance
Do you have the storage for the Xen VM in a file or in a volume? File based 
storage can cache to Ram in Dom0 causing very high disk results.

-----Original Message-----
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amir Maqbool Ahmed
Sent: 24 May 2009 11:12
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] Xen Performance

Hi 

I am a student at the University College of Oslo and have in one experiment 
tried to test the performance of Xenolinux compared to Native linux on Debian 
lenny
2.6.26-2 kernel. 

bonnie++ the disk IO bechmark program was used among other tests like cpu 
intensive scripts.
The goal is to prove the statement (Once again) that Xen adds only an overhead 
of maximum 8%.

The Results of bonnie++ have been surprizing and I want to explain them. 
It shows that for some types of Disk IO, like sequential delete and random 
create Xen performs faster than native linux. A full comparison chart is 
attached as a pdf.
The test are run first from native linux than both from Dom0 and a DomU with 
the same results.

Can you please help me understand these results, How can Xenolinux perform 
faster although only for some types of operations, then native linux?

Plese forgive me If Im missing something completely obvious. 
If you need any further info. please just send me an email and it will be 
provided.

Hope to hear from you soon 

Amir Ahmed

The SAQ Group

Registered Office: 18 Chapel Street, Petersfield, Hampshire GU32 3DZ
SAQ is the trading name of SEMTEC Limited. Registered in England & Wales
Company Number: 06481952

http://www.saqnet.co.uk AS29219

SAQ Group Delivers high quality, honestly priced communication and I.T. 
services to UK Business.

Broadband : Domains : Email : Hosting : CoLo : Servers : Racks : Transit : 
Backups : Managed Networks : Remote Support.

ISPA Member

Find us in http://www.thebestof.co.uk/petersfield


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>