 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Difference performances between HVM and PV guest in har
| To: | xen-users list <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] Difference performances between HVM and PV guest in hard disc reading |
| From: | Heli <helicoterus-elih@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 May 2009 20:50:58 +0200 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 25 May 2009 11:51:32 -0700 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.it; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=1fV05LnYknEs2dTVIubD3nRhCHNV5YvYE6+WsX4z18iSeCjSliOI+J8D7GpxBzvW5JTTnGXSCQe4K48XFdSdOaRmAcPgFk22XfJat5yo0kR3NYkAflLOG32ddtdO4+N1sX07AFLNbNbjINnGVtqF1RxVnFcrX2FZGcIRicNeGCA= ; |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <7207d96f0905241536h5d1e9063ke6737b0dc2a4c2e4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <51147.49632.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7207d96f0905241536h5d1e9063ke6737b0dc2a4c2e4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
Fajar A. Nugraha ha scritto: On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:25 PM, <helicoterus-elih@xxxxxxxx> wrote:I perform some tests to get hard disc performance differences between HVM domU and a paravirtualized one (both Debian Lenny).first of all, make sure you do NOT use file:/ in domU config. At least use tap:aio:I used hdparm ( option -t and -T) to test cache of disc and disc sequential read. Syntax is: hdparm -t|-T /dev/hda1 hdparm -t for hvm returns about 30 MB/sec, wheras hdparm -t for PV return about 180 MB/sec.This is normal. HVM by default should have MUCH lower disk throughput. That's why HVM domUs need PV drivers for both Linux (included by default on RHEL/Centos 5.3, not available yet for newer kernels) and Windows (like GPLPV). Where I can find this drivers for debian?I would like to test a debian HVM virtual machine with these "magic" drivers. I only saw windows ones. ThanksChiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-users] gplpv driver signature problem under win2k8_64bit, mjp |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] Using Xen on load balancer keeps loosing connection, Tom Potwin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Difference performances between HVM and PV guest in hard disc reading, Fajar A. Nugraha |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Difference performances between HVM and PV guest in hard disc reading, Fajar A. Nugraha |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
