|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance
>My system disk is a raid 5 array, 800 GB, so it has plenty of throughput.
>But you say that any technique even NFS or even SAMBA, versos creating a
>file and sharing it via AOE will be comparable?
>Which technique would you pick? I have a back-to-back 1 GB Ethernet cable
>between the two servers.
Well,
Given that you're still using one array for everything, I would just use
whatever is most convenient. Although AoE has some apparent advantages, I am
not a fan as it lacks the security that iSCSI has native. I would probably
export an NFS directory or use iSCSI and export a file using fileio mode.
OTOH, your network between the two is pretty secure :) Use AoE...
I wouldn't even consider Samba, why muddy the waters sharing data between Linux
hosts emulating a non native Linux protocol. That's just silly?
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Joseph L. Casale
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance,
Joseph L. Casale <=
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
- Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Stefan Bauer
- Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Stefan de Konink
- Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Ross Walker
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka
|
|
|
|
|