This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] Boot from OCFS2

To: "Javier Guerra" <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Boot from OCFS2
From: "Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro" <waldirio@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:17:18 -0300
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dominik Vogt <dominik.vogt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:17:56 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=AFkFoNJrWtrZHbxIdFZ/wXn0UOl0Hu8MRUU/ckcN2K4=; b=DMwrYv6qPbvxrnTwla6G7flvaffOFNiv2T1c8GbSOXpYl6MBjtzeFri5x0Mpek+wnI 6HbjRqE5jzSJf+jATp7g/4Ctz2ynOaoGTXKF54oZ097G9hIVEAha+oDfEE2NChqlq/MT HUuDiNqL4CZWyo0c/+7fHgS7ZJ2FHm1oPipbw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=yEOOJ3TYloVh3cWn8FnXkht60oRh9Y5WNeOzkupXZAP6cYU6YNH29diR3YRxTmHm7c CYmcvGL6WsV0Ruytb2UrRVxr4OBLNqDOE8ea510glPeIx1ucDgQ3IawSaeJjfJXJ2fWP bqkYrvDD+hSIUi+GWYadT8Wng8PgARyV2Aiew=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <90eb1dc70807030755j7d747e57vce037df7a09129d4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1214566231.6816.20.camel@aae50> <7df9f1820807021001o20d8e63fp59a7c2963bafc530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1215069831.7557.7.camel@aae50> <7df9f1820807030405v23f220e8mc6883bef564e7a97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1215094893.7557.17.camel@aae50> <90eb1dc70807030742o1c2ca814qd16de0a4ae3c5b16@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1215096665.7557.25.camel@aae50> <90eb1dc70807030755j7d747e57vce037df7a09129d4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   Hello friends
   I'm read only now and yes, it's better each node with it structure and what you think necessary, you share with ocfs file system.
  Maybe you can check RedHat cluster suite for you environment
Good Luck
2008/7/3, Javier Guerra <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Dominik Vogt <dominik.vogt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes of course, the thing is, If the fs isn't clustering on that scsi
> raid sys. it will destroy the fs if I connect with both servers. So my

when i mentioned ext3 (or any non-cluster fs) i meant _different_ ext3
partitions, one for each box.

> try was, to format it with ocfs2! The second server is just a "backup"
> server. So if the first one crashes, I can migrate the domu's easyli to
> the second one. I could work with images, which are on the ocfs2
> partition this would work, but images are not as felxible as lv's...
> But I think i'm definitly on the wrong way now...

again, much easier is to have the root filesystem non-shared, and just
share the storage.


msn: wmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html
Xen-users mailing list
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>