WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] VMWare vs. Xen, is the conflict by VMware deliberate?

To: Evan Lavelle <sa212+xen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] VMWare vs. Xen, is the conflict by VMware deliberate?
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:50:33 +0000
Cc: xen list <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:46:27 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OTvubtKNYmEbzUjAHq/5mNwDhvx0SyAtNLLJ551qOko=; b=wKH+7FL5cuPsFYnnx+5xdAM38I5ASIDAZ/XO02IPlW1t7K7rV5BtY6h3iFmAcB+DGL0ApCETvB+oCcl118pxlcvu7t+k9nlSLp7iWd/GKWat/iYl1ii7G5WVSeE09uDE8ajjBK2ahN46F2E1v78vZvx8EdjWWLsxVwgg8HYDBZU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gm6zG1KeviN+P4UikjAOPdEKG9o+I9ZB7ew//WBVx/Sm+yd3a9AiFRzz+tf+ufPo4LgeEXyxq2FtL5zT0hy8i96D+OAphUjECYeHFfZT/OVdjhCj3+PbNn2ULM6qzQGp9fhVrxx92f3aOp6CtfVMWaX44j2yaOfQdQlS1WseXVU=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <47B957B4.3060509@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <47B94A69.6030809@xxxxxxxxx> <47B957B4.3060509@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
Evan Lavelle wrote:
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:

So, I tried running VMWare Workstation on top of a Xen enabled Dom0. And VMWare promptly started up with a "You're running a Xen Hypervisor! Bad sys-geek, no biscuit! We're taking our start-up tool and going home, p-b-b-b-b-b-b-t-h!"

Is this a well-founded refusal to start on their part, perhaps due to kernel behavior conflicts? Or is this an anti-competitive move, to avoid being able to run VMware Workstation on Xen Dom0's and force people to select VMWare only?

No idea. But, I'm curious. What makes VMWare think that anyone's going to take them seriously after seeing error messages like that one? Do they actually review their code before selling it to anybody?

Evan

Well, the "bad sys-geek, no biscuit" and "p-b-b-b-b-t-h" were me elaborating on it, I'll admit. I'm sorry, my colorful sense of humor seems to hve confused you: I'll try to restrain myself on this list.

The bit about refusing to run with a Xen hypervisor in place was very clear, however. It might be justified, but the refusal to even try to start up seemed excessively harsh. I'm happy to accept a warning that what I'm about to attempt with my software is a bad idea, but I want a reference to exactly what the problem is or at least the ability to try it, anyway, after insisting on the warning.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users