WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Simplest OS possible?

To: "John Krautheim" <jkrautheim@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Simplest OS possible?
From: "Paul Reiber" <reiber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:56:48 -0800
Delivery-date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:57:20 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=QjZhh8arpqlziC/rksAbUX8nY8FXdUmHc6zJYwE9HuA=; b=ZMArO02gro8mPQsN1p5Tg+rgab82KFi8CnIeyKrds1eqv+WeF4c6YHPlPGt8w1agfLrlxlZosz4YD9VRPphuMJAi/jc1LEApOC2ErUk+xfkZ1g4mhL23cjVzLcRrzHwJ/S+OyaC3G0a5prX8Ckllac1Y1VU3wPBC8MZK31dPPXg=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=N8Fa+PpwtUwUiG668n9NBwwY7xM5NoMp9LBj/gN4PvtN/rUVS6VGNK+0gRmIonR6sUuCDHi3Xr/B8oVwUic0q9PJfutoy/uhzM5zHy7Dze/SldG8c2eqK5mlQtZ28i+acCqz1peyu2eZ29MVYxj+NvSaT3RuW3LGlKudzCf3yp8=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <90eb1dc70802161148v33e0ed4fg65f494be788bb2d1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <e9e313210802111051n61d84decj87dd41f4e19d6c7d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47B72598.6010803@xxxxxxxxxx> <90eb1dc70802161148v33e0ed4fg65f494be788bb2d1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: reiber@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 2/16/08, Javier Guerra <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Busybox plus kernel usually goes around 5Meg or less

...but this leads us straight back to Gerhard's question, as to the
purpose for the domU.

AFAIK Busybox is without virtual memory support; maybe that's
changed?    If it's still without VM support, that severely hampers
many potential use cases.

-pbr
http://reiber.org

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users