This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] Network Performance issues on 3.1 - FC7

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Network Performance issues on 3.1 - FC7
From: jim burns <jim_burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:32:46 -0400
Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:33:33 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070925134634.by4w7jzidk48c44c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20070925134634.by4w7jzidk48c44c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (sfid-20070925_141838_265781_48BF7275)
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070831.706792)
On Tue September 25 2007 1:46:34 pm Errol Neal wrote:
> For some  
> reason, network performance is very bad, causing the CPU on the guest  
> to go through the roof at very low bit rates - say under 5MB per  
> second.

Just to be sure, you did specify type=ioemu in your 'vif' array spec, right? I 
had poor performance on my winxp hvm on fc7 also, till I added that. It is 
now about 1/2 the performance of dom0, with no significant cpu load.

Xen-users mailing list