|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Re: HVM domU Solaris 10 (Marc Patino G?mez)
i've been wondering the same thing as Marc Patino above,
i have been building Intel boxes up until now, especially with the
multicore Intels being quite cheap.
can anyone confirm that a new large box, meant to run paravirt and
hvm, AMD would be the better choice ?
i think real mode HVM would be very interesting to have.
does anyone know where to find more info on this ?
I can't answer your question with empirical evidence, but I'm just about
to buy a large-ish AMD-based system due to what I've read on this list
and elsewhere for a couple years. I'm going this way in part because I
feel that AMD has a more correct virtualization implementation, in the
same way that they have a more correct quad-core implementation, and in
part because their 2- and 4-socket quad-core chips are an incredible
value relative to Intel's chips
(http://anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=3091&p=2) - assuming
top-performance isn't your goal... Besides, its fun to support the
underdog ;)
Best,
Kent
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|