xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions
Thanks a lot, I appreciate your help.
1. I tried with the same configuration and with the kernel of dom0, but I
receive a lot of errors, on both Fedora Core 7 and Centos 5 (systems with
which I've tried xen).
2.Yap that's a bridge interface. I'll look into your mails about advance
bridging, thanks.
Best regards.
>> 1. On CentOS 5, Redhat Enterprise 5 and Fedora core 6 and up, the xen
>> kernel
>> can be used for both dom0 and domU. There is no need anymore for two
>> kernels.
>>
>> 2. I don't know the complete answer to your second question. From your
>> ifconfig output, it looks as if Fedora Core 7 creates a virbr0 interface
>> instead of a xenbr0 interface. You could check if this is really a bridge
>> with the command "brctl show". You probably have to execute this as root.
>>
>> Then if I understand your question correctly, you are trying to setup a
>> xen
>> guest domain to act as a firewall/router/gateway/whatever for your lan.
>>
>> So I assume you only want this guest domain to use the external network
>> card
>> (your eth0). There are two ways of accomplishing this:
>> * either use PCI passthrough so that your dom0 won't see eth0, but instead
>> it's passed to your guest system (search for pciback on Google for more
>> info). Unfortunatly, I didn't manage to set this up in my particular case,
>> so
>> I used the seconde option:
>> * create two xenbridges, one for your external network interface, and one
>> for
>> your internal network interface. Then configure dom0 such that it isn't
>> allowed to use the bridge for the external interface. You can do this by
>> either disabling the virtual interface in dom0 (which will be called eth0)
>> or
>> by setting some firewall rules in dom0, or both.
>> You can search this list for one of my earlier mails, where I explain my
>> configuration (on CentOS 5). It's titled "advanced bridging..." and dated
>> May
>> 16th, 2007.
>>
>> Hopefully this will help you along the way.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Geert
>>
>> On Tuesday 5 June 2007 10:34, Octavian Teodorescu wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> 1. Regarding Centos and Fedora core 7 compared with fedora core 5. I've
>>> seen that on fedora core 5 when you want to install xen you have to
>>> install the following packages: xen, kernel-xen0 and kernel-xenU (of
>>> course with the dependencies needed). But on Centos, FC7 and I think
>>> redhat versions, you only have to install xen and kernel-xen, you don't
>>> have any kernel for the guest system. In my case I could only start a
>>> xen
>>> guest (on FC7) with an older kernel-xenU installed from FC version 5.
>>>
>>> My question is: Why does the newer releases of linux has xen kernel
>>> prebuilt but just for dom0, not for the guest systems, and you can't
>>> even
>>> find a domU kernel special for those systems?
>>>
>>> 2.My network topology in my home is like this:
>>> --------
>>> -router-
>>> --------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------- ------------
>>> -linux xen- ---- -other 2 pc-
>>> ----------- ------------
>>>
>>> The linux xen machine has two network interfaces and xen installed.
>>> I want: - one windows machine virtualized
>>> - one linux machine for which I want to have a public ipaddress
>>> (to put the ip in DMS on the router) and I want it to use eth0 (so
>>> in this case the traffic can not be sniffed by other guest systems
>>> or dom0).
>>>
>>> ifconfig -a (on dom0) it shows like this:
>>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:E8:76:E2:4D
>>> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>>> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>>> RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
>>> Interrupt:21 Base address:0x2000
>>>
>>> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:76:B3:16:AB
>>> inet addr:192.168.0.101 Bcast:192.168.0.255
>>> Mask:255.255.255.0
>>> inet6 addr: fe80::216:76ff:feb3:16ab/64 Scope:Link
>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>>> RX packets:198578 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:117290 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>>> RX bytes:267328989 (254.9 MiB) TX bytes:8294632 (7.9 MiB)
>>>
>>> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
>>> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
>>> inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
>>> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
>>> RX packets:2689 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:2689 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>>> RX bytes:12510296 (11.9 MiB) TX bytes:12510296 (11.9 MiB)
>>>
>>> peth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:76:B3:16:AB
>>> inet6 addr: fe80::216:76ff:feb3:16ab/64 Scope:Link
>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>>> RX packets:198588 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:117311 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>>> RX bytes:270906777 (258.3 MiB) TX bytes:8813848 (8.4 MiB)
>>> Base address:0x40c0 Memory:92200000-92220000
>>>
>>> vif4.0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF
>>> inet6 addr: fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 Scope:Link
>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>>> RX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:6 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1
>>> RX bytes:1068 (1.0 KiB) TX bytes:342 (342.0 b)
>>>
>>> virbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF
>>> inet addr:192.168.122.1 Bcast:192.168.122.255
>>> Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/64 Scope:Link
>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>>> RX packets:43 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:17 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>>> RX bytes:3208 (3.1 KiB) TX bytes:2018 (1.9 KiB)
>>>
>>> I don't see any xen bridge, because that's what I think I need: one
>>> network card, and one xen bridge.
>>> I found on google that I could use the following script:
>>> #!/bin/sh
>>> dir=$(dirname "$0")
>>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0
>>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1
>>> "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=2 netdev=eth2 bridge=xenbr2
>>> And then set it into xen-config.sxp:
>>> network-script matrix-network
>>> But it gives errors that network-script has only start, stop and status.
>>> The only thing that it succeds is that I can see a xen bridge. If this
>>> would work, doesn't this affects other guest domains also?
>>>
>>> My question is: How can I set a guest dom to use directly a network card
>>> with other ip class ?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Octav
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-users mailing list
>>> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>>
>> --
>> Kobalt W.I.T.
>> Web & Information Technology
>> Brusselsesteenweg 152
>> 1850 Grimbergen
>>
>> Tel : +32 479 339 655
>> Email: info@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-users mailing list
>> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions, Octavian Teodorescu
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions, Nico Kadel-Garcia
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions, Geert Janssens
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions,
Octavian Teodorescu <=
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions, Geert Janssens
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions, Octavian Teodorescu
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions, Geert Janssens
- RE: [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions, Petersson, Mats
- RE: [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions, Octavian Teodorescu
- RE: [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions, Petersson, Mats
- RE: [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions, Octavian Teodorescu
- RE: [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions, Petersson, Mats
Re: [Xen-users] Xen a couple of questions, Mark Williamson
|
|
|