[Xen-users] Physical Dev Access

To:	<xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-users] Physical Dev Access
From:	"John Anderson" <johna@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:35:00 -0700
Delivery-date:	Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:14:57 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcaRazG31IXhVPvuQ6WhVdiE8sVdqw==
Thread-topic:	Physical Dev Access

Hello,

Can an HVM domain (unmodified kernel, fully virtualized) access physical devices via pciback.hide=(XX:XX.XX) & pic=[‘XX:XX:XX”] in the xen config file? I’m trying to figure out whether this is not working because it’s impossible, or if this is not working because I did something wrong.

Thanks,

John A.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-users] Physical Dev Access, John Anderson <= Re: [Xen-users] Physical Dev Access, Andrej Radonic Re: [Xen-users] Physical Dev Access, Lieuwe de Vries

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] OOM killer problem, Keir Fraser
Next by Date:	RE: [Xen-users] Only able to start 2 domUs, John Anderson
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-users] OOM killer problem, Satoshi Uchida
Next by Thread:	Re: [Xen-users] Physical Dev Access, Andrej Radonic
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

[Xen-users] Physical Dev Access