| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Moved from Xen 2 to Xen 3... some questions..
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:25:35PM +0100, George Styles wrote:
> Ive got it working, but I want to ask a couple of questions about it.
I can't help with all of them, but I'll answer a couple of your
questions.
> 1. There no longer seems to be a seperate DomU and Dom0 built when I build
> from source. Is this the new policy? this would suit me, as I always used
> Xen0 kernels in my guest domains anyway.
Yes. You can still build seperate kernels if you wish, but it is no
longer the default.
> 5. Is there ANY way to see the pre-linux-kernel messages from boot (the
> messages from the hypervisor)? they scroll past so quickly I cannot read
> them, then if I get a kernel panic when the Linux kernel starts, I cannot
> see what the hypervisor was saying. It turned out to be lack of sata
> drivers in the kernel (they were modules), but that was guesswork. Im sure
> the Xen boot messages would tell me what hardware it had picked up.
xm dmesg
> 6. When I was trying to build a custom kernel (with the sata drivers in),
> i tried the usual
> make ARCH=xen menuconfig
> in the linux source dir, but it gave an error (something about no such
> target or somesuch).
> Is this no longer nescesary? it worked OK when I ommitted the ARCH=xen,
> but I didnt proceed as I wasnt sure if it would compile in the Xen
> stuff... whats going on???
Yes Xen is no longer a sub-arch, and has been merged into the normal
system. So you can exclude it as you did with safety.
Steve
--
http://www.steve.org.uk/
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home