RE: [Xen-users] RE: [Fedora-xen] Difficulties using the Fedora Core 4

["Leonardo Pinto" <listas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Already it distrusted that the problem could be distinct between hardwares.
- Then the Xen: 2.6.12-1.1454_FC4.i686 is an unstable tree? The problem is:
- How we will be able to place in a server in production the Fedora Core 5
that still one meets in Test?
- He would not be dangerous to make this? Or I can trust the packages
contained in it?

--
Leonardo Pinto
listas#openlogic dot com br


> swiotlb=force/8m should *not* be required with xen 3.0.0, only with
> pre-release versions of the -unstable tree (such as the RH FC4 RPMs).
>
> The vast majority of machines seem to work fine with acpi/apic enabled
> -- I've only seen a handful of people say they've needed to turn them
> off, and several of these have found that the problem goes away if they
> updated their BIOS. I would like to get to the bottom of these reports,
> though.


________________________________________________
Mensagem enviada usando OpenLogic WebMail 2.7.2


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users