| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Pacifica/VT
Petersson, Mats wrote:
Unfortunately, for a variety of reasons, the answers to the above
questions are kept secret, and although I work for AMD, I'm not privvy
to the information you ask for. Even if I was, I wouldn't be allowed to
tell you [or anyone else that didn't have the NDA]. I know you think
we're just doing this to either frustrate people or to make people buy
the current hardware even tho' the next generation is going to be
different. That's not quite the objective here, but we don't really want
everyone [especially SOME people in the competing company ;-)] to know
what we're up to when it comes to next generation hardware.
Is it possible to have even vague comments on this?
Has a lot to say on nearterm hardware buys.
Sorry that I can't help. I'd love to, and I think you understand that...
Of cause I do, but it still had to be tried ;)
And no, I don't think AMD is the least significant bit interested in
annoying its custumer base.
Matter of fact (my view) is that AMD in the past has produced quite
longlived sockets and cpu's.
You may call me a AMD devotee, using the brand since the 2900 days.
I'll place my bet on S939 and hope for a Pacifica enabled cpu - which I
feel will be available anyway, given that sockets success.
--
Kind regards,
Mogens Valentin
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home