|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] multiple vif's/bridges
Hi Andrew!
andrew mathes wrote:
> hm, tcpdump from external -> eth3 of dom0 looks fine
>
> tcpdump from exteran -> eth1 of domU = no reply
>
> tcpdump from eth3 -> ext = fine
>
> tcpdump from eth3->domU ... the ping says it's ok, but tcpdump shows
> nothing
>
> likewise domU->eth3 ... says it's pinging, but tcpdump shows nothing
>
Run tcpump on xen-br1 instead of eth3 and you should see the ICMP packets.
> so is what's happening here is both sides pinging the bridge, but
> nothing is going through? i have this in dmesg:
>
> device vif1.0 entered promiscuous mode
> xen-br0: port 1(vif1.0) entering learning state
> xen-br0: topology change detected, propagating
> xen-br0: port 1(vif1.0) entering forwarding state
> device vif1.1 entered promiscuous mode
> xen-br1: port 2(vif1.1) entering learning state
> xen-br1: topology change detected, propagating
> xen-br1: port 2(vif1.1) entering forwarding state
>
> so that looks good ...
ACK.
> i'm not supposed to make the domU gateway the same as the domO nic or
> anything am i?
dom0 isn't a gateway (forwarding is disabled). Bridging runs entirely on
layer 2 (Ethernet), not layer 3 (IP).
>
> perhaps that dump information will clarify the problem ...
>
> i hope =)
Not really. I have ne idea where the mistake in your config is. :-(
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [Xen-users] multiple vif's/bridges, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-users] multiple vif's/bridges,
Mark Doll <=
|
|
|
|
|